The Problem of Evil Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

The Problem of Evil - Essay ExampleThere are people with numerous doubts, and others hold on to their faith in theology. The paper establishes a discussion of the topic though a description, analysis and evaluation of arguments by various philosophers, and it will also establish the stance of the paper concerning the topic. Emmanuel Levinas is single of the philosophers who asserts that evil influences people into doing the wrong things thus, he seeks to develop a discussion that accounts for evil. In fact, his argument is establish on the role of rationality through the propagation of evil, which seems to be underestimated (Katz, 2005). Moreover, he argues that evil is infused in common transformation of temptations that are forbidden concerning impulse of good. Furthermore, his approach to the problem of evil is based on the subtraction of the conventional perception of theodicy that is considered a justification or rationalization of evil along with suffering inflicted on peo ple. The other philosopher is Morilyn McCord Adams with an argument that the problem of evil relates to problem of reconciling existence of horrendous evils with Gods existence, which is suitable for people. In fact, Adams offers proposals as solutions of the problems, whereby she appeals to various forms of intimacy with God. Furthermore, this intimacy is focused on participants of horrendous evils (Earl, 2011). ... However, Kant fails to sort out the propensity of evil thus, in that location is need to focus on interpretation of the propensity of evil and link with claims of evil of humanity (Duncan, 2011). Nevertheless, there are features that distinguish interpretation of the issue, whereby there are commentators who have ignorance of the issue. Moreover, there is serious analogy drawn by Kant concerning the propensity of evil and addiction. In this case, Kant has plausible argument regarding the argument of human race, and it is reasonable. 2. Description and analysis of ph ilosophers views Levinass views offer a chance of creating a perception of evil in a different light, whereby he considers evil as a disregard of acts and not a remnant of life, and he considered the source of evil to be inability of attuning to other. In fact, this form of evil offers a cognitive content of detachment from humanity, whereby people fail to see their responsibility. Therefore, this leads to an assertion that there is a precondition of other forms of evil. On the other hand, Levinas raises claims that indicate that evil makes people stand suffering, whereby one may seek to invert the relationship between suffering and evil. Furthermore, he poses a rejection of the conception of suffering, whereby he considers suffering to be a secure component of the meaning of human life. Adams focuses on worry associated with respect to horrendous evil concerning the way God would defeat horrendous evil, which is in the context of participants lifetime. In fact, she argues that G od would be supporting(a) good people suffering from horrendous evil, thereby allowing their lives to subdue to evil (Swinburne, 2012). Therefore, her